Advertise on Chainspect

Compare Arbitrum vs eCash

Arbitrum vs eCash TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 66X higher than eCash TPS

Arbitrum logo
11.35 tx/s
eCash logo
0.17 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 65X higher than eCash max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
eCash logo
31.24 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 116X higher than eCash max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
eCash logo
52.43 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 94X higher than eCash transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
40.9K txns
eCash logo
435 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 99.92% shorter than eCash block time

Arbitrum logo
286ms
eCash logo
6m

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than eCash finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
eCash logo
0s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 273X more total transactions than eCash

Arbitrum logo
2.41B txns
eCash logo
8.84M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 10 months after eCash

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
eCash logo
Nov 15, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than eCash Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
eCash logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Arbitrum has 97.14% fewer validators than eCash has miners

Arbitrum logo
1
eCash logo
35

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Arbitrum has no data, while eCash hashrate is 0.0183 EH/s

Arbitrum logo
—
eCash logo
0.0183 EH/s

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while eCash is PoW

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
eCash logo
Proof of Work (PoW)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than eCash council governance

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
eCash logo
Council

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 2.54X more developers than eCash

Arbitrum logo
2,486
eCash logo
979

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 5.73X more commits than eCash

Arbitrum logo
219,639
eCash logo
38,361

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 34X more repos than eCash

Arbitrum logo
135
eCash logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 7.91X more stars than eCash

Arbitrum logo
10,857
eCash logo
1,373

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 9.64X more watchers than eCash

Arbitrum logo
1,456
eCash logo
151

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 14,853,940,920,083X higher than eCash on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$20.8K
eCash logo
$0.0000000014

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 39,816,956,181X higher than eCash average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.017
eCash logo
$0.000000000000426

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 8.37X higher than eCash market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.15B
eCash logo
$138M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 12X higher than eCash FDV

Arbitrum logo
$1.67B
eCash logo
$144M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 28% lower than eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
68.92%
eCash logo
95.73%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 24,407X higher than eCash price

Arbitrum logo
$0.1675
eCash logo
$0.000006862

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow