Get listed on Chainspect

Compare Arbitrum vs Polkadot

Arbitrum vs Polkadot TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 100% higher than Polkadot TPS

Arbitrum logo
11.35 tx/s
Polkadot logo
0 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 4.4X higher than Polkadot max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Polkadot logo
462.7 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6.1X higher than Polkadot max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Polkadot logo
1,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 100% higher than Polkadot transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
40.9K txns
Polkadot logo
0 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 95.22% shorter than Polkadot block time

Arbitrum logo
286ms
Polkadot logo
5.99s

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Polkadot finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Polkadot logo
30s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 52X more total transactions than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
2.41B txns
Polkadot logo
46.1M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Polkadot logo
May 26, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.45% lower than Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Polkadot logo
182

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
1
Polkadot logo
600

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Polkadot stake is $912M

Arbitrum logo
—
Polkadot logo
$912M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polkadot is Nominated Proof of Stake

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Polkadot logo
Nominated Proof of Stake

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Polkadot governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Polkadot logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 72.75% fewer developers than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
2,486
Polkadot logo
9,122

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 68.93% fewer commits than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
219,639
Polkadot logo
706,894

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 76.56% fewer repos than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
135
Polkadot logo
576

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 69.54% fewer stars than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
10,857
Polkadot logo
35,646

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 32.93% fewer watchers than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
1,456
Polkadot logo
2,171

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 209,539X higher than Polkadot on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$20.8K
Polkadot logo
$0.0994

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 184X higher than Polkadot average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.017
Polkadot logo
$0.0000921

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 32.24% lower than Polkadot market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.15B
Polkadot logo
$1.7B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 19.98% lower than Polkadot FDV

Arbitrum logo
$1.67B
Polkadot logo
$2.09B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 15.32% lower than Polkadot Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
68.92%
Polkadot logo
81.39%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 83.2% lower than Polkadot price

Arbitrum logo
$0.1675
Polkadot logo
$0.9967

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow