Compare Arbitrum vs Solana
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs Solana Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 97.03% lower than Solana TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 67.6% lower than Solana max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 90.62% lower than Solana max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 97.03% lower than Solana transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 36.56% shorter than Solana block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 65X longer than Solana finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Solana is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Arbitrum has 98.01% fewer total transactions than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Solana
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Solana Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 94.73% lower than Solana Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.86% fewer validators than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Solana stake is $36.22B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Solana is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Solana off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Solana Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 77.59% fewer developers than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 2.14X more commits than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 2.94% fewer repos than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 75.49% fewer stars than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 20.05% fewer watchers than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Solana Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 97.25% lower than Solana chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 1.94X higher than Solana average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 98.44% lower than Solana market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 97.62% lower than Solana FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 34.41% lower than Solana Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 99.85% lower than Solana price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Solana Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.