Advertise on Chainspect

Compare Arbitrum vs TON

Arbitrum vs TON TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 74.41% lower than TON TPS

Arbitrum logo
11.35 tx/s
TON logo
44.36 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 1.32X higher than TON max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
TON logo
1,542 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 94.18% lower than TON max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
TON logo
104,715 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 74.41% lower than TON transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
40.9K txns
TON logo
160K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 31.73% shorter than TON block time

Arbitrum logo
286ms
TON logo
419ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 1,035X longer than TON finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
TON logo
800ms

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 33.26% fewer total transactions than TON

Arbitrum logo
2.41B txns
TON logo
3.61B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 3 months after TON

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
TON logo
May 26, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 98.77% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
TON logo
81

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.74% fewer validators than TON

Arbitrum logo
1
TON logo
381

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while TON stake is $799M

Arbitrum logo
—
TON logo
$799M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while TON is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and TON governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
TON logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 3.97X more developers than TON

Arbitrum logo
2,486
TON logo
626

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 6.34X more commits than TON

Arbitrum logo
219,639
TON logo
34,667

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 30.05% fewer repos than TON

Arbitrum logo
135
TON logo
193

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 38.12% fewer stars than TON

Arbitrum logo
10,857
TON logo
17,545

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 14.35% fewer watchers than TON

Arbitrum logo
1,456
TON logo
1,700

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 9.58X higher than TON on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$20.8K
TON logo
$2.17K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 30X higher than TON average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.017
TON logo
$0.00057

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 65.92% lower than TON market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.15B
TON logo
$3.39B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 73.42% lower than TON FDV

Arbitrum logo
$1.67B
TON logo
$6.3B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.28X higher than TON Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
68.92%
TON logo
53.77%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 85.98% lower than TON price

Arbitrum logo
$0.1675
TON logo
$1.19

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow