Compare Sonic vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTSonic vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Sonic TPS is 85.72% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Sonic max TPS is 44.04% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Sonic max theoretical TPS is 65X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Sonic transaction volume is 85.72% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Sonic block time is 3.6X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Sonic finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Sonic is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Sonic has 91.02% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Sonic was launched 3 years after Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Sonic has 39X more validators than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Sonic stake is $54.05M, while Arbitrum has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Sonic is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Sonic and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Sonic has 95.7% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Sonic has 92.52% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Sonic has 88.63% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Sonic has 99.18% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Sonic has 94.77% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Sonic chain revenue is 98.6% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Sonic average transaction fee is 91.91% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Sonic market cap is 79.45% lower than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Sonic FDV is 86.34% lower than Arbitrum FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Sonic Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.5X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Sonic price is 57.63% lower than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Sonic Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.