Advertise on Chainspect

Compare TON vs Arbitrum

TON vs Arbitrum TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

TON TPS is 3.91X higher than Arbitrum TPS

TON logo
44.36 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
11.35 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

TON max TPS is 24.24% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

TON logo
1,542 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

TON max theoretical TPS is 17X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

TON logo
104,715 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

TON transaction volume is 3.91X higher than Arbitrum transaction volume

TON logo
160K txns
Arbitrum logo
40.9K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

TON block time is 1.46X longer than Arbitrum block time

TON logo
419ms
Arbitrum logo
286ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

TON finality is 99.9% shorter than Arbitrum finality

TON logo
800ms
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

TON has 1.5X more total transactions than Arbitrum

TON logo
3.61B txns
Arbitrum logo
2.41B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

TON was launched 3 months before Arbitrum

TON logo
May 26, 2021
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 81X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

TON logo
81
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

TON has 381X more validators than Arbitrum

TON logo
381
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

TON stake is $799M, while Arbitrum has no data

TON logo
$799M
Arbitrum logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

TON is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

TON and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

TON logo
On-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

TON has 74.82% fewer developers than Arbitrum

TON logo
626
Arbitrum logo
2,486

Data from Chainspect

Commits

TON has 84.22% fewer commits than Arbitrum

TON logo
34,667
Arbitrum logo
219,639

Data from Chainspect

Repos

TON has 1.43X more repos than Arbitrum

TON logo
193
Arbitrum logo
135

Data from Chainspect

Stars

TON has 1.62X more stars than Arbitrum

TON logo
17,545
Arbitrum logo
10,857

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

TON has 1.17X more watchers than Arbitrum

TON logo
1,700
Arbitrum logo
1,456

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

TON on-chain revenue is 89.56% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

TON logo
$2.17K
Arbitrum logo
$20.8K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

TON average transaction fee is 96.64% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

TON logo
$0.00057
Arbitrum logo
$0.017

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

TON market cap is 2.93X higher than Arbitrum market cap

TON logo
$3.39B
Arbitrum logo
$1.15B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

TON FDV is 3.76X higher than Arbitrum FDV

TON logo
$6.3B
Arbitrum logo
$1.67B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

TON Market Cap to FDV ratio is 21.99% lower than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio

TON logo
53.77%
Arbitrum logo
68.92%

Data from Chainspect

Price

TON price is 7.13X higher than Arbitrum price

TON logo
$1.19
Arbitrum logo
$0.1675

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow