Compare Waterfall vs Arbitrum

Waterfall TPS is 100% lower than Arbitrum TPS

0 tx/s

17.77 tx/s

Waterfall max TPS is 41X higher than Arbitrum max TPS

83,333 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 6.84X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

41,666 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

Waterfall transaction volume is 100% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

0 txns

64K txns

Waterfall block time is 100% shorter than Arbitrum block time

0s

268ms

Waterfall finality is 97.1% shorter than Arbitrum finality

24s

13m 48s

Waterfall has 98.58% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

34.1M txns

2.41B txns

Waterfall was launched 3 years after Arbitrum

Jul 17, 2024

Aug 31, 2021

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Waterfall has 4X more validators than Arbitrum

4

1

Waterfall and Arbitrum have no data

—

—

Waterfall is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Waterfall council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

Waterfall has 68.18% fewer developers than Arbitrum

791

2,486

Waterfall has 89.26% fewer commits than Arbitrum

23,574

219,593

Waterfall has 89.47% fewer repos than Arbitrum

14

133

Waterfall has 99.97% fewer stars than Arbitrum

3

10,857

Waterfall has 99.86% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

2

1,457

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum on-chain revenue is $11.2K

—

$11.2K

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.0119

—

$0.0119

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.15B

—

$1.15B

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $1.66B

—

$1.66B

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 68.92%

—

68.92%

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.1665

—

$0.1665