Algorand 
Aptos 
Arbitrum 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Polygon 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Boba Network 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Noble 
Particle 
Plume 
Quai Network 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Sophon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare Waterfall vs Avalanche
Open in ChatGPTWaterfall vs Avalanche Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Waterfall TPS is 96.61% lower than Avalanche TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 134X higher than Avalanche max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 35X higher than Avalanche max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Waterfall transaction volume is 96.61% lower than Avalanche transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Waterfall block time is 3.19X longer than Avalanche block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Waterfall finality is 12X longer than Avalanche finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Waterfall and Avalanche are both layer 1 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Waterfall has 97.88% fewer total transactions than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 4 years after Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Avalanche Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is 96.29% lower than Avalanche Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Waterfall has 99.4% fewer validators than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Waterfall has no data, while Avalanche stake is $1.447B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall and Avalanche are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Avalanche on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Avalanche Developer Activity
Developers
Waterfall has 18.88% fewer developers than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Waterfall has 80.4% fewer commits than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Waterfall has 90.43% fewer repos than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Waterfall has 99.95% fewer stars than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Waterfall has 99.78% fewer watchers than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Avalanche Financials New
Chain Revenue
Waterfall has no data, while Avalanche chain revenue is $2.408K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Waterfall has no data, while Avalanche average transaction fee is $0.0008576
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Waterfall has no data, while Avalanche market cap is $2.774B
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Waterfall FDV is 100% lower than Avalanche FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Waterfall has no data, while Avalanche Market Cap to FDV ratio is 60.32%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Waterfall has no data, while Avalanche price is $6.424
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Avalanche Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Avalanche
Avalanche emerges as a rapid, scalable blockchain platform facilitating the seamless creation and deployment of dApps. Distinguished by its unique consensus mechanism, it's particularly good for DeFi applications, allowing high throughput and nearly instant finality. Its architecture allows for a network of interconnected blockchains, each safeguarded by dynamic subsets of validators, ensuring scalability while maintaining speed, reliability, and security.