Compare Waterfall vs TON

Waterfall TPS is 100% lower than TON TPS

0 tx/s

42.38 tx/s

Waterfall max TPS is 54X higher than TON max TPS

83,333 tx/s

1,542 tx/s

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 60.21% lower than TON max theoretical TPS

41,666 tx/s

104,715 tx/s

Waterfall transaction volume is 100% lower than TON transaction volume

0 txns

153K txns

Waterfall block time is 100% shorter than TON block time

0s

425ms

Waterfall finality is 30X longer than TON finality

24s

800ms

Waterfall has 99.05% fewer total transactions than TON

34.1M txns

3.61B txns

Waterfall was launched 3 years after TON

Jul 17, 2024

May 26, 2021

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is 98.78% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient

1

82

Waterfall has 98.96% fewer validators than TON

4

383

Waterfall has no data, while TON stake is $839M

—

$839M

Waterfall and TON are both PoS

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Waterfall council governance is worse than TON on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

Waterfall has 1.26X more developers than TON

791

626

Waterfall has 31.95% fewer commits than TON

23,574

34,641

Waterfall has 92.75% fewer repos than TON

14

193

Waterfall has 99.98% fewer stars than TON

3

17,536

Waterfall has 99.88% fewer watchers than TON

2

1,700

Waterfall has no data, while TON on-chain revenue is $2.05K

—

$2.05K

Waterfall has no data, while TON average transaction fee is $0.000561

—

$0.000561

Waterfall has no data, while TON market cap is $3.5B

—

$3.5B

Waterfall has no data, while TON FDV is $6.52B

—

$6.52B

Waterfall has no data, while TON Market Cap to FDV ratio is 53.76%

—

53.76%

Waterfall has no data, while TON price is $1.24

—

$1.24