Aleph Zero vs Polygon
Aleph Zero vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon TPS is 31.64 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 113,904 txns
Block Time
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.16s
Finality
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Aleph Zero vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Aleph Zero vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
Aleph Zero has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
Aleph Zero Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Aleph Zero
Aleph Zero delivers scalable, secure, and low-cost deployment with zero-knowledge privacy built in. Because speed and privacy shouldn't be a trade-off.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.