- Compare
- Aura vs Polygon
Aura vs Polygon
Aura vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Aura has no data, while Polygon TPS is 31.64 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Aura has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Aura has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Aura has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 113,904 txns
Block Time
Aura has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.16s
Finality
Aura has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Aura has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Aura has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Aura vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Aura has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Aura has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Aura has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Aura has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Aura has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Aura vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Aura has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
Aura has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
Aura has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
Aura has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
Aura has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
Aura Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Aura
Aura Network is the dedicated RWA chain designed for the next generation of enterprise, entertainment, and government innovation, delivering enhanced efficiency, transparency, and accessibility.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.