AVES vs Polygon
AVES vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
AVES has no data, while Polygon TPS is 31.64 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
AVES has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
AVES has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
AVES has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 113,904 txns
Block Time
AVES has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.16s
Finality
AVES has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
AVES has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
AVES has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
AVES vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
AVES has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
AVES has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
AVES has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
AVES has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
AVES has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
AVES vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
AVES has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
AVES has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
AVES has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
AVES has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
AVES has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
AVES Comparisons
About Blockchains
About AVES
AVES is an innovative blockchain designed to secure personal and corporate data against threats, including AI-driven theft. Its decentralized structure and cryptographic methods prevent unauthorized access, breaches, and tampering.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.