Odyssey vs Polygon
Odyssey vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon TPS is 35.76 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 128,750 txns
Block Time
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.17s
Finality
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Odyssey vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Odyssey vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
Odyssey has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
Odyssey Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Odyssey
Odyssey powered by $DIONE is a purpose-built RWA Layer 1, setting regulatory standards to integrate crypto with the power and utility industries.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.