Osmosis vs Polygon
Osmosis vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon TPS is 35.76 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 128,750 txns
Block Time
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.17s
Finality
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Osmosis vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Osmosis vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
Osmosis has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
Osmosis Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Osmosis
The Osmosis blockchain is a decentralized network, run by 150+ validators and full nodes, with many front-ends and development teams on it.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.