Casper vs Polygon
Casper vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Casper has no data, while Polygon TPS is 35.76 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Casper has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Casper has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Casper has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 128,750 txns
Block Time
Casper has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.17s
Finality
Casper has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Casper has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Casper has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Casper vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Casper has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Casper has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Casper has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Casper has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Casper has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Casper vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Casper has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
Casper has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
Casper has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
Casper has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
Casper has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
Casper Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Casper
Casper is a smart-contracting platform, backed by a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and WebAssembly (Wasm). The network is a permissionless, decentralized, public blockchain.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.