- Compare
- Eclipse vs Polygon
Eclipse vs Polygon
Eclipse vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon TPS is 31.64 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 113,904 txns
Block Time
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.16s
Finality
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Eclipse vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Eclipse vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
Eclipse has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
Eclipse Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Eclipse
Eclipse is an innovative Layer 2 solution that uses the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) to help scale Ethereum.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.