- Compare
- peaq vs Polygon
peaq vs Polygon
peaq vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
peaq has no data, while Polygon TPS is 35.76 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
peaq has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
peaq has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
peaq has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 128,750 txns
Block Time
peaq has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.17s
Finality
peaq has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
peaq has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
peaq has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
peaq vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
peaq has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
peaq has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
peaq has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
peaq has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
peaq has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
peaq vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
peaq has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
peaq has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
peaq has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
peaq has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
peaq has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
peaq Comparisons
About Blockchains
About peaq
peaq is the decentralized Web3 network powering the Economy of Things. Built with Substrate and designed to solve some of our biggest societal and economic challenges, it ensures that the incentives of people and increasingly intelligent machines are aligned.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.