Redstone vs Polygon
Redstone vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Redstone has no data, while Polygon TPS is 31.64 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Redstone has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Redstone has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Redstone has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 113,904 txns
Block Time
Redstone has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.16s
Finality
Redstone has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Redstone has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Redstone has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Redstone vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Redstone has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Redstone has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Redstone has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Redstone has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Redstone has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Redstone vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Redstone has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
Redstone has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
Redstone has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
Redstone has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
Redstone has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
Redstone Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Redstone
Redstone is a chain built from the ground up for onchain games and autonomous worlds. It comes with an automatic MUD indexer, blazing fast edge RPCs, and super low fees.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.