Compare Flow vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTFlow vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Flow TPS is 90.95% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Flow max TPS is 88.5% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Flow max theoretical TPS is 36.01% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Flow transaction volume is 90.95% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Flow block time is 3.2X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Flow finality is 98.79% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Flow is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Flow has 50.77% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Flow was launched 1 year before Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Flow vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Flow Nakamoto Coefficient is 9X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Flow has 272X more validators than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Flow stake is $130.5M, while Arbitrum has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Flow is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Flow off-chain governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Flow vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Flow has 71.79% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Flow has 19.96% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Flow has 1.43X more repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Flow has 54.76% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Flow has 1.64X more watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Flow vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Flow chain revenue is 99.41% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Flow average transaction fee is 94.88% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Flow market cap is 72.31% lower than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Flow FDV is 84.44% lower than Arbitrum FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Flow Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.78X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Flow price is 4.48% lower than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
Flow vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Flow Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Flow
Flow is a layer one blockchain designed from the ground up for consumer apps and the digital assets that power them. The network runs on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism with a unique "multi-role" architecture that solves the blockchain trilemma, balancing scalability, efficiency, and cost.
FLOW ($FLOW) is the native utility token that is used for:
- Fees for processing transactions and storing data.
- Buying, selling, and trading assets on Flow
- Staking and delegating to secure the network
Flow tools include:
- Cadence, a purpose-built smart contract programming language designed for consumer-grade applications
- Full EVM equivalence, allowing anything from Ethereum to work on Flow
- Protocol-level account abstraction and mobile support for onboarding new users
- Cross-chain interoperability with the wider web3 ecosystem
- Developer hub with comprehensive documentation and tools
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.