Compare Scroll vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTScroll vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Scroll TPS is 98.03% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Scroll max TPS is 90.97% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Scroll max theoretical TPS is 97.76% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Scroll transaction volume is 98.03% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Scroll block time is 6.92X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Scroll finality is 14X longer than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Scroll and Arbitrum are both layer 2 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Scroll has 92.81% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Scroll was launched 2 years after Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Scroll Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Scroll and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Scroll and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Scroll is Rollup (ZK), while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Scroll multisig governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Scroll has 88.57% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Scroll has 93.04% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Scroll has 41.08% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Scroll has 52.02% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Scroll has 55.35% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Scroll chain revenue is 97.42% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Scroll average transaction fee is 1.04X higher than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Scroll market cap is 98.5% lower than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Scroll FDV is 95.58% lower than Arbitrum FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Scroll Market Cap to FDV ratio is 66.18% lower than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Scroll price is 55.87% lower than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Scroll Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Scroll
Scroll, a Layer 2 Ethereum network, aims to simplify scaling solutions for projects utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Its primary mechanism, zkEVM, integrates zero-knowledge proofs with the EVM, enabling rapid Ethereum transaction confirmation without the need to store and transfer additional transaction data. Scroll aims to establish a universal network that grants developers a user experience and security level akin to Ethereum while surpassing Ethereum in throughput, verification speed, and gas fee affordability
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.