Telos vs Arbitrum
Telos vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Telos TPS is 94.04% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Telos max TPS is 97.89% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Telos max theoretical TPS is 62% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Telos transaction volume is 94.04% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Telos block time is 2X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Telos finality is 84.78% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Telos is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Telos was launched 3 years before Arbitrum
Telos vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Telos Nakamoto Coefficient is 8X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Telos has 43X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Telos stake is $4.407M, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Telos is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Telos and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Telos vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New
Developers
Telos has 86.72% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Repos
Telos has 11.11% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Commits
Telos has 85.21% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Stars
Telos has 96.88% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Watchers
Telos has 62.89% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Telos vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Telos Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Telos
Telos is a blockchain platform built on EOSIO software, focusing on governance, scalability, and sustainability. It features transparent governance allowing token holders to participate in decision-making. With advanced resource management and a Delegated Proof-of-Stake consensus, Telos achieves high scalability. It emphasizes environmental consciousness and fosters a strong community of developers and users.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.