Bybit referral banner

Compare Arbitrum vs Cronos Network

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 23X higher than Cronos Network TPS

Arbitrum logo
13.93 tx/s
Cronos Network logo
0.6 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 14X higher than Cronos Network max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Cronos Network logo
141.7 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 1.13X higher than Cronos Network max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Cronos Network logo
5,390 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 23X higher than Cronos Network transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
50.1K txns
Cronos Network logo
2.16K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 33.88% shorter than Cronos Network block time

Arbitrum logo
282ms
Cronos Network logo
426ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Cronos Network finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Cronos Network logo
0s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 20X more total transactions than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
2.37B txns
Cronos Network logo
120M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 2 months before Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Cronos Network logo
Nov 8, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Cronos Network Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Cronos Network logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99% fewer validators than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
1
Cronos Network logo
100

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Cronos Network stake is $985.4M

Arbitrum logo
—
Cronos Network logo
$985.4M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Cronos Network is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Cronos Network logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Cronos Network governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Cronos Network logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 3.72X more developers than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
2,469
Cronos Network logo
663

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 11X more commits than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
214,733
Cronos Network logo
19,528

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 4.59X more repos than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
133
Cronos Network logo
29

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 9.32X more stars than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
10,843
Cronos Network logo
1,164

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 11X more watchers than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
1,463
Cronos Network logo
134

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 128X higher than Cronos Network on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$20.85K
Cronos Network logo
$163.3

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 3.85X higher than Cronos Network average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.01998
Cronos Network logo
$0.005184

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 54.5% lower than Cronos Network market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.539B
Cronos Network logo
$3.383B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 66.64% lower than Cronos Network FDV

Arbitrum logo
$2.268B
Cronos Network logo
$6.8B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.36X higher than Cronos Network Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
67.86%
Cronos Network logo
49.75%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 3.34X higher than Cronos Network price

Arbitrum logo
$0.2268
Cronos Network logo
$0.068

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow