Canton vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 43.17 tx/s

C
Arbitrum logo
43.17 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

C
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

C
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 155K txns

C
Arbitrum logo
155K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

C
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

C
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

C
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.75B total transactions

C
Arbitrum logo
1.75B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

C
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Canton vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

C
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

C
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Canton and Arbitrum have no data

C
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

C
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

C
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Canton vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,364 developers

C
Arbitrum logo
2,364

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

C
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,441 commits

C
Arbitrum logo
189,441

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,514 stars

C
Arbitrum logo
10,514

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,617 watchers

C
Arbitrum logo
1,617

Data from Chainspect

Canton vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $62.07K

C
Arbitrum logo
$62.07K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.01376

C
Arbitrum logo
$0.01376

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.215B

C
Arbitrum logo
$1.215B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.163B

C
Arbitrum logo
$2.163B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%

C
Arbitrum logo
56.18%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Canton has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2163

C
Arbitrum logo
$0.2163

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Canton

Canton is the first privacy-enabled open blockchain network, ensuring limitless connections that preserve privacy.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Canton Socials

Arbitrum Socials