Compare Cosmos vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTCosmos vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 29.31 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 105K txns
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Data from Chainspect
Type
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.78B total transactions
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Data from Chainspect
Cosmos vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
Cosmos and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Cosmos vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,372 developers
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,722 commits
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,543 stars
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,615 watchers
Data from Chainspect
Cosmos vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $7.702K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.002745
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.215B
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.163B
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2163
Data from Chainspect
Other Comparisons
Cosmos Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Cosmos
Cosmos is an ever-expanding ecosystem of interoperable and sovereign blockchain apps and services, built for a decentralized future.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.