Bybit referral banner

Compare Cronos Network vs Arbitrum

Cronos Network vs Arbitrum TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Cronos Network TPS is 97.57% lower than Arbitrum TPS

Cronos Network logo
0.28 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
11.35 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Cronos Network max TPS is 93.04% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

Cronos Network logo
141.7 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Cronos Network max theoretical TPS is 11.57% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

Cronos Network logo
5,390 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Cronos Network transaction volume is 97.57% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

Cronos Network logo
994 txns
Arbitrum logo
40.9K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Cronos Network block time is 1.69X longer than Arbitrum block time

Cronos Network logo
484ms
Arbitrum logo
286ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Cronos Network finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality

Cronos Network logo
0s
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Cronos Network has 94.97% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

Cronos Network logo
121M txns
Arbitrum logo
2.41B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Cronos Network was launched 2 months after Arbitrum

Cronos Network logo
Nov 8, 2021
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Cronos Network vs Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Cronos Network Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Cronos Network logo
4
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Cronos Network has 100X more validators than Arbitrum

Cronos Network logo
100
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Cronos Network stake is $768M, while Arbitrum has no data

Cronos Network logo
$768M
Arbitrum logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Cronos Network is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Cronos Network logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Cronos Network and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

Cronos Network logo
On-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Cronos Network vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Cronos Network has 73.29% fewer developers than Arbitrum

Cronos Network logo
664
Arbitrum logo
2,486

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Cronos Network has 91.1% fewer commits than Arbitrum

Cronos Network logo
19,555
Arbitrum logo
219,639

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Cronos Network has 78.52% fewer repos than Arbitrum

Cronos Network logo
29
Arbitrum logo
135

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Cronos Network has 89.28% fewer stars than Arbitrum

Cronos Network logo
1,164
Arbitrum logo
10,857

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Cronos Network has 90.8% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

Cronos Network logo
134
Arbitrum logo
1,456

Data from Chainspect

Cronos Network vs Arbitrum Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

Cronos Network on-chain revenue is 98.18% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

Cronos Network logo
$379
Arbitrum logo
$20.8K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

Cronos Network average transaction fee is 31.66% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

Cronos Network logo
$0.0116
Arbitrum logo
$0.017

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Cronos Network market cap is 2.33X higher than Arbitrum market cap

Cronos Network logo
$2.69B
Arbitrum logo
$1.15B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Cronos Network FDV is 3.16X higher than Arbitrum FDV

Cronos Network logo
$5.29B
Arbitrum logo
$1.67B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Cronos Network Market Cap to FDV ratio is 26.38% lower than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio

Cronos Network logo
50.74%
Arbitrum logo
68.92%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Cronos Network price is 68.39% lower than Arbitrum price

Cronos Network logo
$0.05295
Arbitrum logo
$0.1675

Data from Chainspect

Cronos Network vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow