CrossFi vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 32.26 tx/s

C
Arbitrum logo
32.26 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

C
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

C
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 116K txns

C
Arbitrum logo
116K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

C
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

C
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

C
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.85B total transactions

C
Arbitrum logo
1.85B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

C
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

CrossFi vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

C
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

C
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

CrossFi and Arbitrum have no data

C
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

C
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

C
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

CrossFi vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,376 developers

C
Arbitrum logo
2,376

Data from Chainspect

Commits

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum has 190,106 commits

C
Arbitrum logo
190,106

Data from Chainspect

Repos

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

C
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Stars

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,613 stars

C
Arbitrum logo
10,613

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,618 watchers

C
Arbitrum logo
1,618

Data from Chainspect

CrossFi vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $14.11K

C
Arbitrum logo
$14.11K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.00854

C
Arbitrum logo
$0.00854

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.178B

C
Arbitrum logo
$1.178B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.06B

C
Arbitrum logo
$2.06B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 57.19%

C
Arbitrum logo
57.19%

Data from Chainspect

Price

CrossFi has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.206

C
Arbitrum logo
$0.206

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About CrossFi

CrossFi Chain is a layer 1 blockchain with a modular architecture. It consists of two integral parts: Cosmos and EVM. Each part is responsible for its specific functionality, and its work is completely synchronized as a single organism.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

CrossFi Socials

Arbitrum Socials