Compare Etherlink vs Arbitrum

Etherlink TPS is 84.25% lower than Arbitrum TPS

1.54 tx/s

9.78 tx/s

Etherlink max TPS is 98.39% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

32.76 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

Etherlink max theoretical TPS is 78.91% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

1,286 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

Etherlink transaction volume is 84.26% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

5.54K txns

35.2K txns

Etherlink block time is 4.05X longer than Arbitrum block time

1.24s

305ms

Etherlink finality is 97.83% shorter than Arbitrum finality

18s

13m 48s

Etherlink has 95.67% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

104M txns

2.41B txns

Etherlink was launched 3 years after Arbitrum

Feb 25, 2025

Aug 31, 2021

Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Etherlink and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators

1

1

Etherlink and Arbitrum have no data

—

—

Etherlink and Arbitrum are both Rollup (Optimistic)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Etherlink and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

On-chain

On-chain

Etherlink has 92.76% fewer developers than Arbitrum

180

2,486

Etherlink has 97.8% fewer commits than Arbitrum

4,829

219,639

Etherlink has 86.67% fewer repos than Arbitrum

18

135

Etherlink has 99.79% fewer stars than Arbitrum

23

10,857

Etherlink has 99.59% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

6

1,456

Etherlink on-chain revenue is 99.74% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

$54.9

$20.8K

Etherlink average transaction fee is 98.13% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

$0.000317

$0.017

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.15B

—

$1.15B

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $1.67B

—

$1.67B

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 68.92%

—

68.92%

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.1675

—

$0.1675