Compare GraphLinq Chain vs Arbitrum

GraphLinq Chain vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 42.92 tx/s

G
Arbitrum logo
42.92 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s

G
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s

G
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 155K txns

G
Arbitrum logo
155K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

G
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

G
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

G
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.6B total transactions

G
Arbitrum logo
1.6B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

G
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

GraphLinq Chain vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

G
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

G
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

GraphLinq Chain and Arbitrum have no data

G
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

G
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

G
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

GraphLinq Chain vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New

Developers

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,318 developers

G
Arbitrum logo
2,318

Data from Chainspect

Repos

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 127 repos

G
Arbitrum logo
127

Data from Chainspect

Commits

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 185,413 commits

G
Arbitrum logo
185,413

Data from Chainspect

Stars

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,376 stars

G
Arbitrum logo
10,376

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,623 watchers

G
Arbitrum logo
1,623

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About GraphLinq Chain

The GraphLinq Chain is a blockchain that is specifically designed to support the GraphLinq Protocol. The chain is a Proof-of-Authority (POA) blockchain that provides a secure and scalable platform for running automation. The GraphLinq Protocol utilizes the GraphLinq Chain to ensure that automation is executed securely and accurately.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

GraphLinq Chain Socials

Arbitrum Socials