GraphLinq Chain vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 40.56 tx/s

G
Arbitrum logo
40.56 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

G
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

G
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 146K txns

G
Arbitrum logo
146K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

G
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

G
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

G
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.73B total transactions

G
Arbitrum logo
1.73B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

G
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

GraphLinq Chain vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

G
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

G
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

GraphLinq Chain and Arbitrum have no data

G
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

G
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

G
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

GraphLinq Chain vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,362 developers

G
Arbitrum logo
2,362

Data from Chainspect

Repos

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 128 repos

G
Arbitrum logo
128

Data from Chainspect

Commits

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,301 commits

G
Arbitrum logo
189,301

Data from Chainspect

Stars

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,492 stars

G
Arbitrum logo
10,492

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,617 watchers

G
Arbitrum logo
1,617

Data from Chainspect

GraphLinq Chain vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $15.41K

G
Arbitrum logo
$15.41K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.005594

G
Arbitrum logo
$0.005594

Data from Chainspect

Price

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2188

G
Arbitrum logo
$0.2188

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

GraphLinq Chain has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.229B

G
Arbitrum logo
$1.229B

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About GraphLinq Chain

The GraphLinq Chain is a blockchain that is specifically designed to support the GraphLinq Protocol. The chain is a Proof-of-Authority (POA) blockchain that provides a secure and scalable platform for running automation. The GraphLinq Protocol utilizes the GraphLinq Chain to ensure that automation is executed securely and accurately.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

GraphLinq Chain Socials

Arbitrum Socials