ICB Network vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 64.77 tx/s

I
Arbitrum logo
64.77 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s

I
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

I
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 233K txns

I
Arbitrum logo
233K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

I
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

I
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

I
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.93B total transactions

I
Arbitrum logo
1.93B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

I
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

ICB Network vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

I
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

I
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

ICB Network and Arbitrum have no data

I
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

I
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

I
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

ICB Network vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,381 developers

I
Arbitrum logo
2,381

Data from Chainspect

Commits

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 190,796 commits

I
Arbitrum logo
190,796

Data from Chainspect

Repos

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 130 repos

I
Arbitrum logo
130

Data from Chainspect

Stars

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,667 stars

I
Arbitrum logo
10,667

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,614 watchers

I
Arbitrum logo
1,614

Data from Chainspect

ICB Network vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $90.51K

I
Arbitrum logo
$90.51K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.009097

I
Arbitrum logo
$0.009097

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $644.1M

I
Arbitrum logo
$644.1M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $1.105B

I
Arbitrum logo
$1.105B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%

I
Arbitrum logo
58.27%

Data from Chainspect

Price

ICB Network has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.1105

I
Arbitrum logo
$0.1105

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About ICB Network

ICB Network delivers scalable Web3 infrastructure to power metaverse apps, AI systems, and digital economies—secure, decentralized, and future-ready.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

ICB Network Socials

Arbitrum Socials