Ink vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 34.5 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
34.5 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 124K txns

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
124K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.78B total transactions

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1.78B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Ink vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Ink and Arbitrum have no data

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Ink vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,372 developers

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
2,372

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,722 commits

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
189,722

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,543 stars

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
10,543

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,615 watchers

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1,615

Data from Chainspect

Ink vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $20.88K

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$20.88K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.007471

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.007471

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.157B

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$1.157B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.06B

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$2.06B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
56.18%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.206

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.206

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Ink

Ink is a cutting-edge Layer 2 (L2) blockchain built on Optimism's Superchain and released by Kraken. As a natural evolution of our mission, Ink will serve as a seamless bridge to DeFi, empowering users to move onchain with confidence and ease. Join the community today.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Ink Socials

Arbitrum Socials