Mantle vs Arbitrum
Mantle vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 19.53 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 70,294 txns
Block Time
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Mantle vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Mantle and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Mantle vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New
Developers
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,298 developers
Repos
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos
Commits
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum has 184,536 commits
Stars
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,276 stars
Watchers
Mantle has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers
Other Comparisons
Mantle Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Mantle
Mantle Network is dedicated to building an EVM-compatible scaling solution for Ethereum. This means that all contracts and tools running on Ethereum can operate on the Mantle Network with minimal modifications. Taking advantage of its modular architecture, Mantle Network combines an optimistic rollup with various innovative data availability solutions, providing cheaper and more accessible data availability while inheriting the security of Ethereum.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.