Compare Polygon vs TON
Open in ChatGPTPolygon vs TON Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Polygon TPS is 4X higher than TON TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 65.14% lower than TON max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 97.72% lower than TON max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Polygon transaction volume is 4X higher than TON transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Polygon block time is 28.01% shorter than TON block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Polygon finality is 16.66% shorter than TON finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while TON is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Polygon has 2.25X more total transactions than TON
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 1 year before TON
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs TON Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 94.8% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Polygon has 72.51% fewer validators than TON
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Polygon stake is 46.03% lower than TON stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon and TON are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is worse than TON on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs TON Developer Activity
Developers
Polygon has 3.04X more developers than TON
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Polygon has 2.53X more commits than TON
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Polygon has 11.17% fewer repos than TON
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Polygon has 39.34% fewer stars than TON
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Polygon has 1.09X more watchers than TON
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs TON Financials New
Chain Revenue
Polygon chain revenue is 20X higher than TON chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Polygon average transaction fee is 3.35X higher than TON average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Polygon market cap is 68.05% lower than TON market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Polygon FDV is 84.8% lower than TON FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 2.1X higher than TON Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Polygon price is 92.61% lower than TON price
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs TON Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About TON
The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.