ZKsync vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 34.5 tx/s

Z
Arbitrum logo
34.5 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

Z
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

Z
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 124K txns

Z
Arbitrum logo
124K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Z
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Z
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Z
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.78B total transactions

Z
Arbitrum logo
1.78B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Z
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

ZKsync vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Z
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Z
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

ZKsync and Arbitrum have no data

Z
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Z
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Z
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

ZKsync vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,372 developers

Z
Arbitrum logo
2,372

Data from Chainspect

Commits

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,722 commits

Z
Arbitrum logo
189,722

Data from Chainspect

Repos

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

Z
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Stars

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,543 stars

Z
Arbitrum logo
10,543

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,615 watchers

Z
Arbitrum logo
1,615

Data from Chainspect

ZKsync vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $20.88K

Z
Arbitrum logo
$20.88K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.007471

Z
Arbitrum logo
$0.007471

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.157B

Z
Arbitrum logo
$1.157B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.06B

Z
Arbitrum logo
$2.06B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%

Z
Arbitrum logo
56.18%

Data from Chainspect

Price

ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.206

Z
Arbitrum logo
$0.206

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About ZKsync

ZKsync is a Layer-2 scaling solution that makes transactions on Ethereum cheaper and faster by utilizing zero-knowledge rollups (zk-rollups) and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs).

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

ZKsync Socials

Arbitrum Socials