Algorand 
Aptos 
Avalanche 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Polygon 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Waterfall 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Boba Network 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Noble 
Particle 
Plume 
Quai Network 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Sophon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare ZKsync vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTZKsync vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 21.62 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 77.8K txns
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 250ms
Data from Chainspect
Finality
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Data from Chainspect
Type
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 2.2B total transactions
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Data from Chainspect
ZKsync vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
ZKsync and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Data from Chainspect
ZKsync vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,452 developers
Data from Chainspect
Commits
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 198,657 commits
Data from Chainspect
Repos
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 128 repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,743 stars
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,482 watchers
Data from Chainspect
ZKsync vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $9.882K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.006395
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $485.7M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $776.4M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 62.56%
Data from Chainspect
Price
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.07764
Data from Chainspect
Other Comparisons
ZKsync Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ZKsync
ZKsync is a Layer-2 scaling solution that makes transactions on Ethereum cheaper and faster by utilizing zero-knowledge rollups (zk-rollups) and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs).
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.